Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Kan. App. 2d 140 - State v. Collins

56 Kan. App. 2d 140 - State v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. McCullough · Robinson v. Sunbeam Corp. · State v. Marks · State v. Walters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o overcome a defendant's immunity claim, the State does not need to prove that the defendant's use of force was not justified; it merely has to establish probable cause that the defendant's use of force was not justified.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(a) A person who uses force which, subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 21-5226, and amendments thereto, is justified pursuant to K.S.A. 21-5222, 21-5223 or 21-5225, and amendments thereto, is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer who was acting in the performance of such officer's official duties and the officer identified the officer's self in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, 'criminal prosecution' includes arrest, detention in custody and charging or prosecution of the defendant. .... 9 "(c) A prosecutor may commence a criminal prosecution upon a determination of probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) A person is justified in the use of force against another when and to the extent it appears to such person and such person reasonably believes that such use of force is necessary to defend such person or a third person against such other's imminent use of unlawful force. "(b) A person is justified in the use of deadly force under circumstances described in subsection (a) if such person reasonably believes that such use of deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to such person or a third person. "(c) Nothing in this section shall require a person to retreat if such person is using force to protect such person or a third person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.