Commonwealth v. Mallory’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Horton v. California · Abel v. United States · Minnesota v. Olson · Adair v. United States · Central Railroad v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The “very limited expectation of privacy” the defendant had in the room prior to February 16, [the date of the rape] which was dependent upon the relationship between the defendant and his host, disintegrated that afternoon ... The relationship between the defendant and his host was thereby destroyed.... In sum, when the searches occurred, if he.had any remaining subjective expectation of privacy regarding his room, the defendant certainly had no expectation of privacy that society objectively would recognize as reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.