Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 MASSAPPCT 283 - Commonwealth v. Furst

Commonwealth v. Furst’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2021

10 state decisions

50200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Flagg · Commonwealth v. Troy T. · Commonwealth v. Barsell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For such a ... violation to occur, such words must first be communicated in some manner to the defendant's intended victim, directly or through an intermediary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[m]enacing words alone, even those that express a threat to commit a crime, do not constitute an offense under G. L. c. 275, § 2.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.