Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 MASSAPPCT 436 - Commonwealth v. Cromwell

Commonwealth v. Cromwell’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Latimore · Commonwealth v. Bradshaw · Commonwealth v. Roberts · Commonwealth v. Best · Commonwealth v. Deramo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a conviction may rest entirely on circumstantial evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant’s claim of lack of opportunity to cross-examine [the victim] is without merit in view of his failure to summons her or seek her attendance at the restitution hearing, or to request a continuance after the prosecutor established damages on the basis of the documentary evidence and [the victim’s] previous sworn statement. In the circumstances, the defendant cannot complain that he was not afforded a meaningful opportunity to challenge the amount of restitution requested and ordered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “facts and circumstances surrounding the accident and from the defendant's cooperation with the field sobriety tests”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.