Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Md. App. 351 - Powell v. State

56 Md. App. 351 - Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2000 · most notably State v. Gee (1984), Tapscott v. State (1995)

28 state decisions

140198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Smith v. Hooey · Houltin v. United States · Eisenstadt v. Baker · Dickey v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[BJarring extraordinary circumstances, we would be reluctant indeed to rule that a defendant was denied this constitutional right [to a speedy trial] on a record that strongly indicates, as does this one, that defendant did not want a speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “"[a]ppellant cannot avail himself of Barker when it is he by his criminal acts in another state or his willful absence from Maryland which prevented the State from proceeding to trial. "”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “1. Length of delay, 2. Reason for delay, 3. Defendant’s assertion of his right, 4. Prejudice to the defendant. 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.