Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Md. App. 72 - Harbin v. H.E.W.S., Inc.

56 Md. App. 72 - Harbin v. H.E.W.S., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Frye · MPC, Inc. v. Kenny · Pat Perusse Realty Co. v. Lingo · First National Bank v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene · MacKall v. Zayre Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of Maryland Rule 315 in general and 315 d 3 in particular is to avoid circuity of legal actions and resolve disputed jural relationships arising out of the same matter in a single proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.