56 Minn. 295
Decided January 25, 1894
Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1894-01-25
<p>Review of remand, from Federal Court.</p> <p>The action of the Federal Courts when remanding a case to the State Courts cannot he reviewed in the latter.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1894-01-25
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1931
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.
¶2(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)