Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

56 Mo. App. 320

Walker v. Carrew

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1894

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1894-01-29

— Hon. R. H. Field, Judge. The plaintiff received notice as contemplated by the statute. Revised Statutes, 1889, sec. 6342; Page v. Railroad, 61 Mo. 78; Brewing Co. v. Hauesler, 11 Mo. App. 387. The evidence is conclusive that at the day of trial and thereafter, plaintiff and his attorney had knowledge of appeal. Attorney said he was glad case had been appealed. Plaintiff tried to compromise the case. This occurred at divers times and testified to by sundry individuals.

Aeeikmed · Decided 1894-01-29

Ellison, J.

¶1— This cause was begun before a justice of the peace where plaintiff had judgment. Defendant appealed to the circuit court, though he did not do so on the day of trial before the justice.

¶2Plaintiff appeared in the circuit court for the purpose of his motion and moved that court to affirm the judgment, for the reason that the appellant had given *322no notice of the appeal as provided by law. This motion was sustained. Defendant seeks to reverse the action of the circuit court by showing that, as a matter of fact, plaintiff and his attorney knew that the appeal had been taken. This will not do; knowledge is not notice. The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
/56/moapp/320 · .json · Public domain