Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 MOAPP 485 - Hauser v. Andersch

Hauser v. Andersch’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1895
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By the act of February 25, 1891 (Session Acts, 1891, p. 45), it is provided that, upon the trial of the issue made by a plea in abatement, if the finding be for defendant and a new trial is refused, The court shall thereupon render judgment that the attachment be abated at the costs of plaintiff and his sureties, and thereupon the plaintiff may file his bill of exceptions as upon any other matter in the proceedings, and the cause shall proceed to trial upon the merits, and the filing of his bill of exceptions by plaintiff shall preserve the attachment in full force.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.