State v. Folk’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently August 2005 · most notably State v. Padilla (1959), State v. Ortega (1966)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Youtsey v. United States · Ashley v. Pescor · In re Smith · Jordan v. State · The People v. Maynard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * *' It is his (the court’s) province to rule whether or not a reasonable doubt can be said to exist as to the sanity of an accused, and this determination will not be lightly overturned. All the authorities recognize the issue must be raised in good faith and supported by a showing sufficient to create a reasonable doubt as to the sanity of an accused.” (Parenthetical insertion by the court.)”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hovey · State v. Roybal““ * * * upon the issue being raised the accused is by right under our statute, [Sec. 41-13-3] supra, entitled to have the jury pass upon it.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hoffman v. State · State v. Chavez““ ‘ “It would be inhuman, and to a certain extent a denial of the right of trial upon the merits, to require one who has been disabled by the act of God from intelligently making his defense to plead or be tried for his life or liberty. There may be circumstances in all cases of which the defendant alone has knowledge, which may prove his innocence, the advantage of which, if insane to such an extent that he did not appreciate the value of such facts, or the propriety of communicating them to his counsel, he would be deprived.” ’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Upton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.