Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 N.M. 689 - State v. Fernandez

State v. Fernandez’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently April 2007 · most notably McCauley v. Ray (1968), State v. Rowell (1966)

61 state decisions

190195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Alaniz · State v. Sena · State v. Gallegos · Radcliffe v. Chaves · Springer Ditch Co. v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 21-5-4, [N.M.S.A.1953]. Evidence in support of application — Findings—Bed- ■ sion. — Upon the filing of a motion -for-change of venue, the court may require evidence in support thereof, and' upon hearing thereon shall make findings and-'1 either grant or overrule said motion.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is obvious when a requisite motion is made, the venue must be changed or in the alternative, the court may require evidence in its support. It is equally clear that if a hearing is had thereon it is the duty of the court to determine the question by its findings. And it is well established that findings thus made will not be disturbed upon review unless it shall appear from the evidence that the trial court acted unfairly and committed palpable abuse of discretion. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.