Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 N.M. 793 - Natseway v. Jojola

Natseway v. Jojola’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Stang v. Hertz Corporation (1970), Stang v. Hertz Corporation (1970)

2 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

13019521960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hogsett v. Hanna · Ickes v. Brimhall · Vukovich v. St. Louis, Rocky Mountain Pacific Co. · Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co. · State Ex Rel. De Moss v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial Dist.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * [T]he courts cannot provide a saving clause or create an exception where the statute contains none.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “None of the preceding provisions of this chapter shall apply to any action or suit which, by any particular statute of this state, is limited to be commenced within a different time, nor shall this chapter be construed to repeal any existing statute of the state which provides a limitation of any action; but in such cases the limitation shall be as provided by such statutes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘ * * * But the fact that hardship may result can furnish no warrant for the courts to supply what the Legislature has omitted or to omit what it has inserted. * * * ’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.