Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Ohio App. 2d 100 - Huelsmann v. State

56 Ohio App. 2d 100 - Huelsmann v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2014

8 state decisions

4019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Armstrong v. Zane's heirs · 51 Ohio App. 2d 83 - J. P. Sand & Gravel Co. v. State · 54 Ohio App. 2d 220 - Kermetz v. Cook-Johnson Realty Corp. · 54 Ohio App. 2d 215 - State, Ex Rel. Nicholson v. Jackson · 122 Ohio St. 126 - The Logan Gas Co. v. Glasgo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Our holding in Kermetz is to the effect that a landowner may bring his action claiming damages for a ‘taking’ either in the Court of Claims, where his bringing such an action would be determined to be a waiver of his right to a jury assessment of the damages as required by the Constitution of the state of Ohio and by the statutes, or, in the alternative, the landowner could bring his action for mandamus in a court having jurisdiction for such original actions, and seek an appropriation proceeding in which a jury would determine the damages involved in such a ‘taking.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.