56 Ohio App. 2d 193 - State v. Eberhardt’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably 14 Ohio App. 3d 396 - State v. Dixon (1984), 140 Ohio App. 3d 650 - State v. Pasqualone (2000)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · State v. Pudlock · 110 Ohio St. 188 - Forest City Investment Co. v. Haas · State v. Gray · State v. Hunt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court prejudicially erred, ignored a manifest injustice, and abused its discretion by denying defendant/appellant's motion to correct improper sentence {¶ 7} Before this court can get to the merits of Senk's appeal, we must determine as a threshold matter whether the July 7, 2006 judgment is a final appealable order. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it is not a final appealable order. {¶ 8} R.C. 2502.02 provides in pertinent part: {¶ 9} "(B) An order is a final order that may be reviewed, affirmed, modified, or reversed, with or without retrial, when it is one of the following: {¶ 10} "(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * When an accused is discharged pursuant to division (B) [a discharge based on the state’s failure to adhere to the speedy trial time requirements] * * *, such discharge is a bar to any further criminal proceedings against him based on the same conduct.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“For purposes of appeal in a criminal case, a final judgment or order amounting to a disposition of the cause usually means the imposition of a sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.