Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Ohio App. 3d 142 - Hardeman v. Wheels, Inc.

56 Ohio App. 3d 142 - Hardeman v. Wheels, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2017

16 state decisions

1201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Preston v. Murty · 23 Ohio App. 3d 85 - Brooks v. Hurst Buick-Pontiac-Olds-Gmc, Inc. · French v. Dwiggins · 48 Md. App. 617 - Thomas v. Ford Motor Credit Co. · 3 Ohio App. 3d 316 - Provident Bank v. Barnhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well-settled that where a court is empowered to award attorney fees by statute, the amount of such fees is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Unless the amount of fees determined is so high or so low as to shock the conscience, an appellate court will not interfere. The trial judge who participated not only in the trial but also in many of the *Page 7 preliminary proceedings leading up to trial has an infinitely better opportunity to determine the value of services rendered by lawyers who have tried a case before him than does an appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “{¶ 8} This language is required in certain consumer credit contracts by a trade regulation rule promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission. Section 433.2(a), Title 16, C.F.R. Commonly referred to as the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “encompass penalties specifically designed to be assessed against the supplier. . . for the supplier's statutory or common-law infractions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.