Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 OHIOST2D 51 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Unger (1981), In re C.S. (2007)

56 state decisions

160197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Gault · Lockett v. Ohio · Davis v. Mississippi · Haley v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A)(1) Except as provided in division (A)(2) of this section, no child shall be fingerprinted or photographed in the investigation of any violation of law without the consent of the juvenile judge. “(2) Fingerprints and photographs of a child may be taken by law enforcement officers when the child is arrested or otherwise taken into custody for the commission of an act that would be a felony if committed by an adult, without the consent of the juvenile judge, when there is probable cause to believe that the child may have been involved in the commission of the act. A law enforcement officer who takes fingerprints or photographs of a child under this division immediately shall inform the juvenile court that the fingerprints or photographs were taken, and shall provide the court with the identity of the child, the number of fingerprints and photographs taken, and the name and address of each person who has custody and control of the fingerprints or photographs or copies of the fingerprints or photographs.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n attempted theft can reasonably be assumed to have occurred from the following facts: the bedroom in which the victim was found was in disorder, the victim's purse and wallet were open, and the bedroom closet was open and appeared to have been `ransacked.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.