Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 OR 554 - Benbow v. James Johns

Benbow v. James Johns’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1938
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1938

6 state decisions

30191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Siren · Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co. · City of Salem v. Lane & Bodley Co. · Hill v. La Crosse · Kirkwood v. Hoxie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person having a demand as aforesaid, instead of proceeding for the recovery thereof against the master, owner, agent, or consignee of the boat or vessel, may, at his option, commence an action against such boat or vessel by name.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The lien is created by the law, and attaches as soon as the labor or material is furnished and is not dependent on any subsequent condition, expressed or implied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.