State v. Clausen’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud · State v. Parker · State v. Parker · 91 Wash. App. 554 - State v. McKenna · State v. Porter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unlike the officer in McKenna , here Parker clearly manifested his intent to place Clausen under custodial arrest when he told Clausen that he was under arrest and that he would be released after he was booked.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We did not hold [in McKenna ] that the jail's status in any way affected the officer's authority to place the defendant under custodial arrest or that a search prior to the defendant's release was invalid.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“generally aware that the jail had not been booking detainees charged with nonviolent misdemeanors,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Craig
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.