Pizzo v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1982
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Waters v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. · Koba v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review · Molton Unemployment Compensation Case · Baker v. Commonwealth · Molnar v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nce the presumption is rebutted it disappears and has no further effect upon the outcome of the case. Waters v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 393 Pa. 247 , 144 A.2d 354 (1955). Following a rebuttal of the presumption, a claimant must produce evidence that he is able to do some work and that there is a reasonable opportunity for securing such work. Molnar v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 40 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 518 , 397 A.2d 869 (1979).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.