Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 SC 379 - State v. Rafe

State v. Rafe’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2005

5 state decisions

2019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was necessary for the appellant to show, not only that he did not know of the juror's disqualification, until after the trial, but that by the use of due diligence, he could not have discovered the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.