Goodhope v. Overgaard’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 1964
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 3 Smith & H. 417 - James v. Joseph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred with actual intent, as distinguished from intent presumed in law, to hinder, delay, or defraud either present or future creditors, is fraudulent as to both present and future creditors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rozan v. Rozan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.