56 So. 2d 521 - Manning v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 88 So. 2d 551 - Charles Sales Corp. v. Rovenger (1956), Parliament Insurance v. Hanson (1982)
1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gentry-Futch Co. v. Gentry · Harris v. Young · Moss v. Sperry · Warden v. Richardson · Ewalt v. Hudson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is well settled that in suits for an accounting, where the answer does not admit the allegations of the complaint and there is no consent to entry of a decree, the proper practice is for the court to determine the initial question of plaintiff's right to an accounting, and an accounting may then be decreed if the finding is in favor of plaintiff upon the preliminary issue. Warden v. Richardson, 203 Okla. 474 , 223 P.2d 338 ; Ewalt v. Hudson, Mo. App., 223 S.W.2d 132 ; Larson v. Crescent Planing Mill Co., Mo. App., 218 S.W.2d 814 ; Jackson v. Elmont Cemetery, Sup., 80 N.Y.S.2d 407 ; Harris v. Young, 298 Ill. 319 , 131 N.E. 670 ; 1 Am.Jur. 306; 1 C.J.S., Accounting, § 40, p. 680."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.