Randall v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 320 So. 2d 415 - Gill v. Shively · 669 So. 2d 328 - Melvik v. Melvik · Malone v. Malone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It was error for the trial court to consider the wife's premarital property, such as her engagement and wedding rings which were found to be gifts to the wife, in the equitable distribution scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moody v. Newton“The general rule is that an engagement ring is nonmarital property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moody v. Newton“); Melvik v. Melvik , 669 So.2d 328 , 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moody v. Newton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.