Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 SO3D 868 - Melton v. State

Melton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Johnson v. Avery · Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co. · 354 So. 2d 362 - Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'N

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In view of the anomalous procedures in British criminal courts, it is not surprising that the framers of the American Constitution specifically provided for a right to retain counsel in criminal prosecutions. Because English practice had recognized the right to retain civil counsel, there was no need to reaffirm the prerogative. Therefore, the sixth amendment’s rejection of the English criminal practice does not represent the denial of a right to retain counsel in civil litigation. The existence of such a right has, indeed, been generally assumed in the American legal system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.