Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

56 So. 3d 899

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-03-18

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2012

3 state decisions

Relies on 35 So. 3d 54 - Dunbar v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 We affirm Williams’ convictions and sentences without prejudice to his right to *900 seek appropriate and timely post-conviction relief. See Dunbar v. State, 35 So.3d 54, 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (sentencing errors that occur after effective date of amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), even if formerly deemed fundamental or patent on face of record, cannot be reviewed by appellate court if issue is not raised at sentencing or in timely post-sentencing proceeding pursuant to rule 3.800).

¶2 AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
/56/so3d/899 · .json · Public domain