State v. Munn’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 2021
1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Katz v. United States · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant had a subjective expectation of privacy in his conversations” and that “the expectation of privacy was reasonable and justified,” where police officers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a trial court's findings of fact in a suppression hearing will be upheld unless the evidence preponderates otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. RDS v. State“resolution of conflicts in the evidence are matters entrusted to the trial judge as the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. RDS v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.