Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Tenn. App. 607 - Stone v. Stone

56 Tenn. App. 607 - Stone v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2000

22 state decisions

18019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 45 Tenn. App. 583 - Raskind v. Raskind · Williams v. Williams · 33 Tenn. App. 496 - Rush v. Rush · Gardner v. Gardner · State v. Gilbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The matter of what amount of alimony should be decreed to a wife out of the estate of her husband in a divorce proceedings is in the sound discretion of the trial judge. This discretion when soundly exercised, will not be disturbed on appeal. There are no hard and fast rules governing the amount of alimony which may be decreed to a wife. Many elements enter in for consideration. The amount of alimony to be decreed is not to be controlled solely by the value of the estate owned by the husband. While this is an important factor to be considered it does not alone control. The value of any separate estate owned by the wife is an element to be considered. The age and station in life are elements, and also the income and sources of income by the respective parties. The way and manner in which the estate has been accumulated and contributions made thereto by the wife, either out of her own funds or by her own work and efforts. In many jurisdictions the general conduct of the husband, and the mistreatment of the wife, where she is free from fault, may also be considered in arriving at a proper award for alimony.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.