Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 U.S. 367 - the Executors of John McDonogh v. Mary Murdoch

the Executors of John McDonogh v. Mary Murdoch’s Empirical Analysis

56 U.S. 367 · 1853

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2010 · most notably Helvering v. New York Trust Co. (1934), Jones v. Habersham (1882)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 43 state decisions — followed in 20 states

13018531860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Runyan v. Lessee of Coster · Lane v. Vick · M'Keen v. Delancy's Lessee · First Municipality of New Orleans v. McDonough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That without a positive prohibition municipal corporations in Louisiana should be incapacitated from receiving legacies for the public purposes of health, education and charity, seems to me to be repugnant to all sound ideas of policy, and to the reason of the law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.