Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Wash. 2d 652 - Tellier v. Edwards

56 Wash. 2d 652 - Tellier v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
8
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 84 Wash. 2d 959 - Godfrey v. Washington (1975), 107 Wash. 2d 503 - Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and Paroles (1986)

3 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

100196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hess v. Pawloski · Ogdon v. Gianakos · White v. Powers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'a valid exercise of the police power based upon the right of the State to regulate the use of its highways for their protection, and the protection of persons and property within the State.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “relates to practice, procedure or remedies, and does not affect a substantive or vested right”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[E]ach resident. . . who, while operating a motor vehicle on the public highways of this state, is involved in any accident, collision or liability and thereafter within three years departs from this state appoints the secretary of state ... as [that person's] lawful attorney for service of summons.....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.