56 Wash. App. 451 - State v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 814 - State v. Barklind · 154 Cal. App. 3d 353 - People v. Cervantes · 176 W. Va. 677 - Fox v. State · 51 Wash. App. 192 - State v. Earls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] poor person subject to an order requiring payment of money could be incarcerated [for contempt] when a wealthy person would not.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. Repayment must not be mandatory; 2. Repayment may be imposed only on convicted defendants; 3. Repayment may only be ordered if the defendant is or will be able to pay; 4. The financial resources of the defendant must be taken into account; 5. A repayment obligation may not be imposed if it appears there is no likelihood the defendant's indigency will end; 6. The convicted person must be permitted to petition the court for remission of the payment of costs or any unpaid portion; 7. The convicted person cannot be held in contempt for failure to repay if the default was not attributable to an intentional refusal to obey the court order or a failure to make a good faith effort to make repayment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.