56 Wash. App. 472 - State v. Wake’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 105 Wash. 2d 632 - State v. Terrovona · 89 Wash. 2d 788 - State v. MacK · 6 Wash. App. 531 - State v. Toliver · 51 Wash. App. 544 - State v. Day · 44 Wash. App. 467 - State v. Stock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when required in the administration of justice and the defendant will not be substantially prejudiced in the presentation of the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Woods“[i]f congestion at the state crime lab excuses speedy trial rights, there is insufficient inducement for the State to remedy the problem.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Howell“the issuance of a subpoena is a critical factor in granting a continuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.