56 Wash. App. 880 - Jong Choon Lee v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2025
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 80 Wash. 2d 547 - Sorenson v. City of Bellingham · 99 Wash. 2d 373 - Diamond v. Cross · 111 Wash. 2d 445 - Hart v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVS. · 39 Wash. App. 460 - State v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Washington courts have repeatedly construed the word "any”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tili · State v. Sutherby“`[w]henever any person has been committed under any provision of this chapter ... such commitment ... cannot exceed the maximum possible penal sentence for any offense charged for which he was acquitted by reason of insanity.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sutherby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.