Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Wis. 2d 269 - Kind v. Vilas County

56 Wis. 2d 269 - Kind v. Vilas County’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 10 Wis. 2d 1 - Schultz v. Winther · 23 Wis. 2d 426 - Weaver v. Knudson · Blatchford v. Voss · Lally v. Rossman · Baackes v. Blair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... The area of land between the meander line and the actual shore; whether the error in the meander line was sufficient so that the meander line would constitute the boundary; the type and comparative value of the land at the time; the preference for regularly shaped parcels of land; and consequences such as depriving one claimant of all lake frontage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. . If the proper claims of adjacent owners of riparian lots of lands between meander and actual shore lines conflict, each shall have his proportion of such shorelands.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... in determining what is adjacent to a tract of land, one does not cross an inlet or lake to locate `adjacent' properties....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.