In re Schulze’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Olle v. Henry & Wright Corp. · Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the UMWA Combined Benefit Fund · Waifersong, Ltd. v. Classic Music Vending
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“extraordinary circumstances suggesting that [the party seeking relief] is faultless in the delay. " See Q Technology v. Allard ( In re Trans-Industries, Inc. ), 2009 WL 1259991 (E.D. Mich., May 1, 2009) at (citing Pioneer , 507 U.S. at 392 -93 , 113 S.Ct. 1489 ). Not only are there no such "extraordinary circumstances”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) (which the Motion does not.) See, e.g. , Waifersong, Ltd. Inc. v. Classic Music Vending , 976 F.2d 290 , 292 (6th Cir. 1992) (Relief under Civ. Rule 60(b)(1) requires the moving party to show, among other things, that the moving party has a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The circumstances here - an order entered by default due to [Debtor's] failure to timely file a response to a turnover motion - are addressed by Rule 60(b)(1), particularly the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.