In re Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 11 U.S.C. § 722 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Edwards · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey · In Re Tucson Estates · Beezley v. California Land Title Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he only logical basis for reconciling the conflicting elements of [§ 521(a)(2)] is to hold that it is essentially a notice statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not affect the debtor's substantive rights vis a vis the creditor[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was entirely independent of the 'surrender' of the [p]roperty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.