Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

560 F.2d 1285

Docket No. 73-2254.

Herrera v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 12, 1977.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1977-10-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1978

3 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez · Idaho ex rel. Evans v. Oregon · Herrera v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1977-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ruben Montemayor, Harry A. Nass, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., Paul Scott Kelly, Jr., Raymond F. Beagle, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for Yellow Freight System, Inc.

¶3Edward W. Penshorn, Bradford F. Miller, San Antonio, Tex., for Local 657.

¶4Hal K. Gillespie, G. William Baab, Dallas, Tex., for Southern Conference of Teamsters.

¶5Before WISDOM, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7The Supreme Court of the United States, 1977, 431 U.S. 952, 97 S.Ct. 2669, 53 L.Ed.2d 268, vacated the judgment of this Court in Herrera v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 5 Cir. 1974, 505 F.2d 66, and remanded the cause to this Court for further consideration in light of East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 1977, 431 U.S. 395, 97 S.Ct. 1891, 52 L.Ed.2d 453.

¶8We now hold that the District Court did not err in denying relief on the ground that none of the plaintiffs (city drivers) could satisfy the qualifications for a road driver because of age or weight or driving record. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is

¶9AFFIRMED.

/560/f2d/1285 · .json · Public domain