Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 F.2d 1298 - Moore v. Cowan

Moore v. Cowan’s Empirical Analysis

560 F.2d 1298 · 1977

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
6
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably United States v. Klein (1988), United States v. Davis (1986)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

25019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Doyle v. Ohio · Stone v. Powell · Schlesinger v. Ballard · Schick v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The plain purpose of the broad power conferred by § 2, cl. 1, was to allow plenary authority in the President to ‘forgive’ the convicted person in part or entirely, to reduce a penalty in terms of a specified number of years, or to alter it with conditions which are in themselves constitutionally unobjectionable. * * * “ * * * The no-parole condition attached to the commutation of his death sentence is similar to sanctions imposed by legislatures such as mandatory minimum sentences or statutes otherwise precluding parole; it does not offend the Constitution. * * * ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “than take cognizance of the constitutional claim and render a decision in light thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.