560 F.2d 201 - Young v. Gray — 560 F.2d 201

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2010

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Summary Calendar.*

¶2Calvin Young, pro se.

¶3John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., David M. Kendall, Ben M. Harrison, Joe B. Dibrell, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., Art Kei-narth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Huntsville, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

¶4Before GOLDBERG, CLARK and FAY, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7Appellant Calvin Young is a Texas prisoner. In his handwritten, pro se complaint he alleged that he fell from a trailer and injured his head. He acknowledged that the prison medical authorities provided treatment for the resulting headaches but denied that their treatment was adequate. He asserted that the improper treatment violated the eighth and fourteenth amendments and that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provided him a remedy. The district court dismissed the complaint. We affirm.

¶8A prisoner does not state an eighth amendment claim by alleging “an inadvertent failure to provide adequate medical care”. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 105, 97 S.Ct. 285, 292, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976). Rather, “a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Id.Appellant’s allegations, less extensive than those found wanting in Gamble, fail to meet these standards. Here, as in Gamble, the bare allegation that the doctor should have undertaken additional diagnostic measures does not state an eighth amendment claim.

¶9AFFIRMED.