Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 F.2d 395 - Carter v. Romines

Carter v. Romines’s Empirical Analysis

560 F.2d 395 · 1977

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2008

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

701977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Singleton v. Wulff · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court has suggested two factors to be considered in determining when the third-party rule should be suspended: the relationship of the litigant to the person whose right he seeks to assert, and the ability of the third party to assert his own right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.