Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 F.2d 477 - Alexander T. Arthurs v. Chris O. Stern

Alexander T. Arthurs v. Chris O. Stern’s Empirical Analysis

560 F.2d 477 · 1977

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
14
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 9 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Parcels of Land (1990), Arthurs v. Board of Registration in Medicine (1981)

16 federal appellate · 9 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 14 states

28019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paul v. Davis · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission · United States v. Kordel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here [is nothing] inherently repugnant to due process in requiring the doctor to choose between giving testimony at the disciplinary hearing, a course that may help criminal prosecutors, and keeping silent, a course that may lead to the loss of his license.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he disciplinary board would draw an adverse inference from his silence if he invoked his privilege against self-incrimination at the [disciplinary board’s] hearing. The threat of losing his license ... would force him to testify, ... and mak[e] statements that might be used against him in the criminal trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.