Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 F.2d 849 - Schultz v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

Schultz v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

560 F.2d 849 · 1977

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
February 1997
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1997

7 federal appellate ·

50197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 414

Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. · Smith v. Evening News Assn. · Humphrey v. Moore · Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America v. P Lockridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “collective bargaining agreement establishes a mandatory apprenticeship program that was not made voluntary by the Standards of Apprenticeship or by [certain changes agreed to during contract negotiations (which are not discussed here) ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “union is a proper additional defendant if, as here, plaintiffs allege that their union breached the duty of fair representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]e have demonstrated that the apprenticeship program was mandatory under the [contract].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.