Douglas v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

34 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “What’s up moma Have you been calling cuz? probley not man call O dude an get that hook up to werr I can come home from the county jail or tell him he’s -short because i ain’t gone let him put me in the cross again like he did last time, but he ain’t gone do shit if you don’t' continue to call him and let him know whats going on it’s fiftheen days before the tiral starts and i don’t wánna be up on that county jail if he ain’t talking write tellem, I want 365 days for helping the state to kill some body cause that’s what he plans to do. Plus send me some money daddy was suppose to have sent 25 dollars 3 months ago a nigga ain’t got no money but Ima let you’ll go. stay own brad" miller and I’ll holler at you’ll later love darric”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 104 F. Supp. 3d 1298 - Powell v. Miller

2. “If the applicant has failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in State court proceedings, the court shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim unless the applicant shows that— (A) the claim relies on (i) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (ii) a factual predicate that could not have been previously discovered through the exercise of due diligence; and (B) the facts underlying the claim would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Green v. Addison

3. “Favorable evidence 'is material if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.' " Douglas v. Workman , 560 F.3d 1156 , 1173 (10th Cir. 2009) (quoting Kyles v. Whitley , 514 U.S. 419 , 433, 115 S.Ct. 1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995) ). Here, Mr. Simpson claims the State suppressed three pieces of evidence (collectively, the "Collins Evidence”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Simpson v. Carpenter