Smith v. Hope School’s Empirical Analysis
560 F.3d 694 · 2009
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2613 (§ 103 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · King v. Preferred Technical Group · Kariotis v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. · Buie v. Quad/Graphics, Inc. · McDonald v. Village of Winnetka
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An employee who fraudulently obtains FMLA leave from an employer is not protected by FMLA's job restoration or maintenance of health benefits provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“interfered with or restrained an employee's rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.