Plata v. Schwarzenegger’s Empirical Analysis
560 F.3d 976 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Bauman v. United States District Court · Shuffler v. Heritage Bank · Robert Gilmore Jr Inmates United States of America v. People of the State of California · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hickey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It would be most inappropriate for this court to address [issues not properly raised in the district court] by the extraordinary writ of mandamus before the district court has dealt with them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It would be most inappropriate for this court to address issues . . . by the extraordinary writ of mandamus before the [lower] court has dealt with them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.