United States v. Sturm’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2256 · 18 U.S.C. § 3509 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chambers v. Mississippi · United States v. Salerno · Ake v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he requirements of [the Adam Walsh Act] are consistent, if not coterminous, with the due process guarantee”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. GRENNING
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.