United States v. Root’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Bagley · Weeks v. Angelone · United States v. Cabrales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant argued that ... all of the allegations of evasive acts and tax deficiency for the year covered by the 2000 tax return occurred exclusively in Ohio.... Ultimately, following a hearing, this Court denied Defendant’s motion without prejudice, noting that the Defendant would have the opportunity to reassert any objection to venue at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.