Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 P2D 12 - State v. DeVoe

State v. DeVoe’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2023

10 state decisions

40197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Marchetti v. United States · Garrity v. State of New Jersey · Spevack v. Klein · State v. Sears

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Consideration of such factors led the American Bar Association to recommend that: A revocation proceeding based solely upon commission of another crime ordinarily should not be initiated prior to the disposition of that charge. However, upon a showing of probable cause that another crime has been committed by the probationer, the probation court should have discretionary authority to detain the probationer without bail pending a determination of the new criminal charge. This position has been adopted by the American Law Institute and, at least arguably, by several state legislatures.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Suspension of sentence and probation. Upon entering a judgment of conviction of a crime, or at any time within 60 days from the date of entry of that judgment of conviction, a court, when satisfied that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public as well as the defendant will be served thereby, may suspend the imposition or execution or balance of the sentence or a portion thereof, and place the defendant on probation for a period and upon the terms and conditions as the court considers best.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “The relative informality of a probation revocation proceeding, as compared to the trial of an original criminal charge, underlines the danger. Relaxation of rules of admissibility of evidence, the absence of a jury, a lesser burden of proof — factors such as these can lead to an abuse of the proceedings by basing revocation upon a new criminal charge when the offense could not be proved in an ordinary criminal trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.