Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 P.2d 207 - Hanf v. State

Hanf v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

90197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. California · Smith v. People of the State of California · Mishkin v. State of New York · McCrary v. State · Heartsill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'You are instructed that the words "knowingly”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the trial of all indictments, informa-tions, complaints and other proceedings against persons charged with the commission of a crime, offense or misdemeanor before any court or committing magistrate in this State, the person charged shall at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness, and his failure to make such request shall not create any presumption against him nor be mentioned on the trial; if commented upon by counsel it shall be grounds for a new trial.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Any person who knowingly buys, sells, barters, traffics in, or causes to be delivered or transported in Oklahoma, any picture, moving picture, series of pictures, drawing, diagram or photograph of any person or animal or caricature thereof in an act or acts of sexual intercourse or unnatural copulation shall be deemed guilty of a felony ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.