Mayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Austin v. State · Young v. State · McCoy v. State · Savage v. State · Hampshire v. City of Tulsa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is within the discretion of the court to allow or exclude the testimony of ... a witness [whose testimony would otherwise violate a sequestration rule].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dutton v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.