Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 560 SO2D 768 - Taylor v. Taylor

Taylor v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 485 So. 2d 347 - Connell v. Miller · Ex Parte Hill · 415 So. 2d 1122 - Hinds v. Hinds · Kennedy v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[W]e find the court’s imposition of an additional twenty-five-day sentence to be improper. Because the sentence is to be immediately imposed upon the husband’s violation of the trial court’s directives, it is primarily penal and not coercive in nature. Thus, it appears to this court to be an attempt to punish the husband for any future criminal contempt, despite the trial court’s statement that such sentence was imposed to ensure compliance with the trial court’s orders.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.